| Peer-Reviewed

How Does the Autonomy of AI Products Affect Consumers' Purchase Intention

Received: 16 November 2022    Accepted: 1 December 2022    Published: 8 December 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

As intelligent technology matures, AI products are progressively marketed in the AI era, profoundly changing consumer behavior patterns and life habits. While AI products bring convenience to consumers, they also bring negative experiences to consumers. Especially AI products with certain autonomy will make consumers feel offended and have psychological resistance. This paper explores the intermediary role of psychological resistance in the influence of AI product autonomy on consumers' purchase intention, based on the psychological resistance theory, which is a hot research topic in psychology. The questionnaire data was collected on the Credamo platform, and SPSS26.0 was used to process the data and verify the model assumptions, it is finally concluded that the higher the autonomy of AI products, the easier it is for consumers to feel the threat, generate the psychological resistance, and then reduce the purchase intention, this conclusion has certain theoretical and practical significance for understanding and improving consumers' purchase intention in the AI era. Artificial intelligence products continue to introduce new ones, but consumers generally have a low evaluation of the experience of such products. Intelligent products with a certain degree of autonomy conflict with consumers, which limits their autonomy. Therefore, it is necessary to find a balance between the autonomy of developing AI products and consumer demand in the era of AI.

Published in American Journal of Applied Psychology (Volume 11, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajap.20221106.13
Page(s) 162-166
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

The Autonomy of AI Products, Psychological Resistance, Consumptional Purchase Intention

References
[1] Luo, X., Tong, S., Fang, Z., Zhe, Q. Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases [J]. Marketing Science, 2019, 38 (6): 937-947.
[2] Wang Yating. Research on AI Intelligence Level in Customer Service -- Concept and Literature Review [J]. Industrial Innovation Research, 2022 (18): 117-119.
[3] Christman Z, Rogan J, Eastman J R, et al. Quantifying uncertainty and confusion in land change analyses: a case study from central Mexico using MODIS data [J]. Mapping Sciences & Remote Sensing, 2015, 52 (5): 543-570.
[4] Cheng Chengping. Autonomy, labor ability and economic development of artificial intelligence [J]. Journal of humanities, 2021, (6).
[5] Lu Weihong, Yang Xinfu. Artificial intelligence and human subjectivity reflection [J/OL]. Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Science Edition): 1-13 [2022-11-16].
[6] Lauren, A, Leotti, Sheena, S., Iyengar, Kevin, N. Born to Choose: the Origins and Value of the Need for Control [J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2010, (10).
[7] Chen Yanliang, Sheng Hong. Research on user resistance psychology and influencing factors in AI self-service [J] Operation and Management, 2021 (11): 67-74.
[8] Brehm, J. W. A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press, 1966.
[9] Silvia P J. Reactance and the Dynamics of Disagreement: Multiple Paths From Threatened Freedom to Resistance to Persuasion [J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2006, 36 (5): 673-685.
[10] Edwards SM, Li H, Lee J H. Forced Exposure and Psychological Reactance: Antecedents and Consequences of the Perceived Intrusiveness of Pop-up Ads [J]. Journal of Advertising, 2002, 31 (3): 83-95.
[11] You Jing, Du Juan. Research on consumers' psychological resistance to personalized recommendation information under the "information cocoon room" effect [J]. Journal of Shunde Vocational and technical college, 2019, 17 (01): 22-27 + 35.
[12] Edwards, S. M., Li, H., Lee, J. H.. Forced Exposure and Psychological Reactance: Antecedents and Consequences of the Perceived Intrusiveness of Pop-up Ads. Journal of Advertising, 2002, 31 (3): 83-95.
[13] Li Dongjin, Zhang Chenghu, Li Yan. 2015. Advantages and disadvantages of out of stock: A Study on the purchase intention of similar products mediated by perceived scarcity and psychological resistance [J]. Journal of marketing science, 11 (2): 34-50.
[14] Huang Zhengwei. 2015. Research on customers' online shopping experience under psychological resistance theory [J]. Research on business economics, 26: 48-50.
[15] Wang Yanping, Cheng Yan. Psychological resistance and willingness to accept the active recommendation of online consumers under the influence of reference group and time pressure Analysis [J]. Management review, 2013, 25 (02): 70-78.
[16] Elliott Aronson. Social psychology [M]. HOU Yubo, trans. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 2007: 110.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mimi Tao, Shengxiang She. (2022). How Does the Autonomy of AI Products Affect Consumers' Purchase Intention. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 11(6), 162-166. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20221106.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mimi Tao; Shengxiang She. How Does the Autonomy of AI Products Affect Consumers' Purchase Intention. Am. J. Appl. Psychol. 2022, 11(6), 162-166. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20221106.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mimi Tao, Shengxiang She. How Does the Autonomy of AI Products Affect Consumers' Purchase Intention. Am J Appl Psychol. 2022;11(6):162-166. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20221106.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajap.20221106.13,
      author = {Mimi Tao and Shengxiang She},
      title = {How Does the Autonomy of AI Products Affect Consumers' Purchase Intention},
      journal = {American Journal of Applied Psychology},
      volume = {11},
      number = {6},
      pages = {162-166},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajap.20221106.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20221106.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajap.20221106.13},
      abstract = {As intelligent technology matures, AI products are progressively marketed in the AI era, profoundly changing consumer behavior patterns and life habits. While AI products bring convenience to consumers, they also bring negative experiences to consumers. Especially AI products with certain autonomy will make consumers feel offended and have psychological resistance. This paper explores the intermediary role of psychological resistance in the influence of AI product autonomy on consumers' purchase intention, based on the psychological resistance theory, which is a hot research topic in psychology. The questionnaire data was collected on the Credamo platform, and SPSS26.0 was used to process the data and verify the model assumptions, it is finally concluded that the higher the autonomy of AI products, the easier it is for consumers to feel the threat, generate the psychological resistance, and then reduce the purchase intention, this conclusion has certain theoretical and practical significance for understanding and improving consumers' purchase intention in the AI era. Artificial intelligence products continue to introduce new ones, but consumers generally have a low evaluation of the experience of such products. Intelligent products with a certain degree of autonomy conflict with consumers, which limits their autonomy. Therefore, it is necessary to find a balance between the autonomy of developing AI products and consumer demand in the era of AI.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - How Does the Autonomy of AI Products Affect Consumers' Purchase Intention
    AU  - Mimi Tao
    AU  - Shengxiang She
    Y1  - 2022/12/08
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20221106.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajap.20221106.13
    T2  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
    JF  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
    JO  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
    SP  - 162
    EP  - 166
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5672
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20221106.13
    AB  - As intelligent technology matures, AI products are progressively marketed in the AI era, profoundly changing consumer behavior patterns and life habits. While AI products bring convenience to consumers, they also bring negative experiences to consumers. Especially AI products with certain autonomy will make consumers feel offended and have psychological resistance. This paper explores the intermediary role of psychological resistance in the influence of AI product autonomy on consumers' purchase intention, based on the psychological resistance theory, which is a hot research topic in psychology. The questionnaire data was collected on the Credamo platform, and SPSS26.0 was used to process the data and verify the model assumptions, it is finally concluded that the higher the autonomy of AI products, the easier it is for consumers to feel the threat, generate the psychological resistance, and then reduce the purchase intention, this conclusion has certain theoretical and practical significance for understanding and improving consumers' purchase intention in the AI era. Artificial intelligence products continue to introduce new ones, but consumers generally have a low evaluation of the experience of such products. Intelligent products with a certain degree of autonomy conflict with consumers, which limits their autonomy. Therefore, it is necessary to find a balance between the autonomy of developing AI products and consumer demand in the era of AI.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • College of Business Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China

  • College of Business Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China

  • Sections